Age, Biography and Wiki

Ayesha Vardag (Ayesha Mary Barbara Vardag) was born on 1 March, 1968 in London, is a Solicitor. Discover Ayesha Vardag's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is She in this year and how She spends money? Also learn how She earned most of networth at the age of 56 years old?

Popular As Ayesha Mary Barbara Vardag
Occupation Solicitor
Age 56 years old
Zodiac Sign Pisces
Born 1 March 1968
Birthday 1 March
Birthplace London, England
Nationality United Kingdom

We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 1 March. She is a member of famous with the age 56 years old group.

Ayesha Vardag Height, Weight & Measurements

At 56 years old, Ayesha Vardag height not available right now. We will update Ayesha Vardag's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.

Physical Status
Height Not Available
Weight Not Available
Body Measurements Not Available
Eye Color Not Available
Hair Color Not Available

Who Is Ayesha Vardag's Husband?

Her husband is Stephen Bence

Family
Parents Not Available
Husband Stephen Bence
Sibling Not Available
Children 5

Ayesha Vardag Net Worth

Her net worth has been growing significantly in 2022-2023. So, how much is Ayesha Vardag worth at the age of 56 years old? Ayesha Vardag’s income source is mostly from being a successful . She is from United Kingdom. We have estimated Ayesha Vardag's net worth , money, salary, income, and assets.

Net Worth in 2023 $1 Million - $5 Million
Salary in 2023 Under Review
Net Worth in 2022 Pending
Salary in 2022 Under Review
House Not Available
Cars Not Available
Source of Income

Ayesha Vardag Social Network

Instagram
Linkedin
Twitter
Facebook
Wikipedia Ayesha Vardag Wikipedia
Imdb

Timeline

2019

Vardag’s training in matrimonial law was as one of two assistants to Raymond Tooth, senior partner at London law firm, Sears Tooth, and co-founder of the International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, an invitation-only organisation which now consists of over 500 of the world's leading family lawyers.

2017

In 2017, in a four year-long divorce case complicated by a dispute over whether jurisdiction lay in the UK or Malaysia, Vardag represented London-based former Malaysian beauty queen Pauline Chai whose Malaysian tycoon husband and non-executive chair of Laura Ashley Holdings, Khoo Kay Peng, wanted the case heard in their original homeland. Vardag's jurisdiction argument was decided in favour of her client and ultimately a UK court awarded a settlement of £64 million to Chai -- one of the largest ever family law settlements in the UK.

2016

Vardag is married to Stephen Bence, a financial consultant who is director of strategy at Vardags Ltd. As of April 2016, the couple has five children.

2010

In 2010 Vardag was initially involved with a Radmacher v Granatino, which allowed a prenuptial agreement for the first time in the UK. German heiress Katrin Radmacher won a ruling holding that the prenup drawn up to protect Radmacher’s £100 million fortune from her French-born husband Nicolas Granatino, was legally binding. While the case established for the first time that prenups are enforceable in the UK, courts still retain the discretionary right to veto them if they are found to be unfair. Vardags was removed and replaced from the case by the client before the close of the trial.

2005

Vardag founded Ayesha Vardag solicitors in 2005, which incorporated as Vardags in May 2010.

1996

Vardag qualified as a solicitor in 1996 and was initially trained at Linklaters.

1968

Ayesha Mary Barbara Vardag (born March 1968) is an English solicitor. Her Supreme Court victory in the 2010 case Radmacher v Granatino, is noted for a strengthening of prenuptial agreements' status in English law. By allowing the Radmacher v Granatino prenup to stand, the Supreme Court justices opened the door to consideration of all prenups in Family Law cases. The result was that such agreements became likely to be upheld, except if found to be unfair, in which case the presiding judge has the right to waive.