Age, Biography and Wiki
Erik Bloodaxe (hacker) was born on 1 January, 1970 in New York City, New York, U.S., is a member. Discover Erik Bloodaxe (hacker)'s Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is He in this year and how He spends money? Also learn how He earned most of networth at the age of 53 years old?
| Popular As |
N/A |
| Occupation |
Programmer, entrepreneur, editor |
| Age |
54 years old |
| Zodiac Sign |
Capricorn |
| Born |
1 January 1970 |
| Birthday |
1 January |
| Birthplace |
New York City, New York, U.S. |
| Nationality |
United States |
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 1 January.
He is a member of famous member with the age 54 years old group.
Erik Bloodaxe (hacker) Height, Weight & Measurements
At 54 years old, Erik Bloodaxe (hacker) height not available right now. We will update Erik Bloodaxe (hacker)'s Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
| Physical Status |
| Height |
Not Available |
| Weight |
Not Available |
| Body Measurements |
Not Available |
| Eye Color |
Not Available |
| Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
He is currently single. He is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about He's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, He has no children.
| Family |
| Parents |
Not Available |
| Wife |
Not Available |
| Sibling |
Not Available |
| Children |
Not Available |
Erik Bloodaxe (hacker) Net Worth
His net worth has been growing significantly in 2022-2023. So, how much is Erik Bloodaxe (hacker) worth at the age of 54 years old? Erik Bloodaxe (hacker)’s income source is mostly from being a successful member. He is from United States. We have estimated
Erik Bloodaxe (hacker)'s net worth
, money, salary, income, and assets.
| Net Worth in 2023 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
| Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
| Net Worth in 2022 |
Pending |
| Salary in 2022 |
Under Review |
| House |
Not Available |
| Cars |
Not Available |
| Source of Income |
member |
Erik Bloodaxe (hacker) Social Network
| Instagram |
|
| Linkedin |
|
| Twitter |
|
| Facebook |
|
| Wikipedia |
|
| Imdb |
|
Timeline
During the winter of 2008, Chris Goggans was in India for the ClubHack hacker convention.
As of 2005, Goggans is an recognized expert on information security. He has performed network security assessments for some of the world's largest corporations, including all facets of critical infrastructure, with work spanning 22 countries across four continents. Chris has worked with US Federal law-enforcement agencies on some of America's most notorious computer crime cases. His work has been referenced in publications such as Time, Newsweek and Computerworld, and on networks such as CNN and CNBC.
During the summer of 2003, Goggans was invited to become an associate professor at the University of Tokyo's Center for Collaborative Research.
In closing remarks at a 1995 conference, Goggans remarked that the global hacker community was disorganized and uncoordinated, suggesting that they should focus an attack on some foreign country, such as France.
In a 1994 interview he claimed he had never engaged in malicious hacking, explaining:
Around 1990-1991 Goggans and some other Legion members set up a computer security firm, Comsec, which went out of business by 1992. He later became a senior network security engineer for WheelGroup, a network security group.
Goggans was raided by the US Secret Service on March 1, 1990, but was not charged.
In the call, recorded on February 22, 1990 and later presented in the County Court of Victoria as evidence against Even-Chaim, Goggans and Even-Chaim canvassed how much money they could make from such a venture and how they would split fees from Execucom's competitors. During the call Goggans provided Even-Chaim with a number of dial-up access numbers to Execom's computers, commenting: "There are serious things I want to do at that place", and "There’s stuff that needs to happen to Execucom.". While there is no evidence that Goggans and Even-Chaim acted on this discussion, Goggans' statement of his intentions calls into question the nobility of his hacking ethics.
