Age, Biography and Wiki
Madhumati Mitra was born on 31 May, 1958 in India. Discover Madhumati Mitra's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is She in this year and how She spends money? Also learn how She earned most of networth at the age of 65 years old?
| Popular As |
N/A |
| Occupation |
N/A |
| Age |
66 years old |
| Zodiac Sign |
Gemini |
| Born |
31 May 1958 |
| Birthday |
31 May |
| Birthplace |
N/A |
| Nationality |
India |
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on 31 May.
She is a member of famous with the age 66 years old group.
Madhumati Mitra Height, Weight & Measurements
At 66 years old, Madhumati Mitra height not available right now. We will update Madhumati Mitra's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
| Physical Status |
| Height |
Not Available |
| Weight |
Not Available |
| Body Measurements |
Not Available |
| Eye Color |
Not Available |
| Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
She is currently single. She is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about She's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, She has no children.
| Family |
| Parents |
Not Available |
| Husband |
Not Available |
| Sibling |
Not Available |
| Children |
Not Available |
Madhumati Mitra Net Worth
Her net worth has been growing significantly in 2022-2023. So, how much is Madhumati Mitra worth at the age of 66 years old? Madhumati Mitra’s income source is mostly from being a successful . She is from India. We have estimated
Madhumati Mitra's net worth
, money, salary, income, and assets.
| Net Worth in 2023 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
| Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
| Net Worth in 2022 |
Pending |
| Salary in 2022 |
Under Review |
| House |
Not Available |
| Cars |
Not Available |
| Source of Income |
|
Madhumati Mitra Social Network
| Instagram |
|
| Linkedin |
|
| Twitter |
|
| Facebook |
|
| Wikipedia |
|
| Imdb |
|
Timeline
Mitra retired from the Calcutta High Court on 30 May 2020.
In 2019, Mitra was one of several judges who adjudicated in litigation concerning the widely reported Saradha Group financial scandal. She refused to grant protection from arrests to the former Kolkata Commissioner of Police, Rajeev Kumar, during these proceedings, holding that his status as a former police officer did not afford him any special privileges during the investigation. In June 2019, Mitra wrote a notable judgment that established the principle that orders of maintenance granted before divorce under the Domestic Violence Act, would continue to be enforced after divorce if the spouse in question was unable to support themselves.
In 2018, Mitra was appointed as the registrar of the National University of Juridical Sciences in West Bengal, replacing two acting registrars who had briefly occupied the post earlier that year. Mitra held the appointment for three months before resigning. She became an additional judge of the Calcutta High Court on 12 October 2018. Her appointment was made permanent in April 2020.
Mitra joined the West Bengal Judicial Service in 1987, and adjudicated in civil and criminal courts, as well as in special courts constituted to try offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. She was the district and sessions judge and the chair of the district legal services authority in Purba Medinapur. Mitra has additionally been deputed to advise the West Bengal and Andaman & Nicobar governments on legal issues, acting as a deputy secretary for law. She was appointed as the Registrar-General of the Calcutta High Court in 2017.
Madhumati Mitra (born 31 May 1958) is a former judge of the Calcutta High Court, in West Bengal, India. She briefly served as the registrar of the National University of Juridical Sciences as well as of the Calcutta High Court before being appointed as a judge at the High Court. During her tenure as a High Court judge, she adjudicated in a number of significant cases, including in litigation concerning the Saradha Group financial scandal.
