Age, Biography and Wiki
Chantal McCorkle was born on 1968 in Slough, United Kingdom. Discover Chantal McCorkle's Biography, Age, Height, Physical Stats, Dating/Affairs, Family and career updates. Learn How rich is She in this year and how She spends money? Also learn how She earned most of networth at the age of 55 years old?
We recommend you to check the complete list of Famous People born on .
She is a member of famous with the age 55 years old group.
Chantal McCorkle Height, Weight & Measurements
At 55 years old, Chantal McCorkle height not available right now. We will update Chantal McCorkle's Height, weight, Body Measurements, Eye Color, Hair Color, Shoe & Dress size soon as possible.
Physical Status |
Height |
Not Available |
Weight |
Not Available |
Body Measurements |
Not Available |
Eye Color |
Not Available |
Hair Color |
Not Available |
Dating & Relationship status
She is currently single. She is not dating anyone. We don't have much information about She's past relationship and any previous engaged. According to our Database, She has no children.
Family |
Parents |
Not Available |
Husband |
Not Available |
Sibling |
Not Available |
Children |
Not Available |
Chantal McCorkle Net Worth
Her net worth has been growing significantly in 2022-2023. So, how much is Chantal McCorkle worth at the age of 55 years old? Chantal McCorkle’s income source is mostly from being a successful . She is from United Kingdom. We have estimated
Chantal McCorkle's net worth
, money, salary, income, and assets.
Net Worth in 2023 |
$1 Million - $5 Million |
Salary in 2023 |
Under Review |
Net Worth in 2022 |
Pending |
Salary in 2022 |
Under Review |
House |
Not Available |
Cars |
Not Available |
Source of Income |
|
Chantal McCorkle Social Network
Timeline
After being transferred from FCI Dublin in California, as of July 2009 she was an inmate at FMC Carswell (Fort Worth, Texas) in the United States with an expected prison sentence expiry date of 7 July 2014. McCorkle remained in a medium-security prison, whereas William J. McCorkle (her ex-husband), had transferred to a low-security "camp" prison the previous year. McCorkle was not eligible for transfer to a lower-security prison because, as a British citizen, she was viewed as a high flight risk.
As of September 2010 she was living with her parents in High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, and had reverted to using her birth name, "Watts". In May 2012, she was working as a personal trainer at a gym in Henley on Thames, Oxfordshire.
A subsequent request for a Treaty Transfer (i.e. to serve the remainder of her sentence in a UK prison) was approved in May 2009. In early August, McCorkle appeared at a Texas Magistrate's Court to sign legal papers formally consenting to return to the UK. By 24 August 2009 McCorkle was in transit to the UK, incarcerated first at the BOP Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City and then (on 29 August) at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York. On 30 September 2009 she was driven to the nearest international airport, where custody was signed over to British prison officers who escorted her back to the UK. After arriving at London Heathrow airport, McCorkle was transferred to HMP Holloway in London. At Holloway she was assigned the following inmate identity number: EP6484.
On 30 October 2009, McCorkle was transferred to HMP Send, near Woking in Surrey. HMP Send has a significantly lower security classification than HMP Holloway, with a much easier prison regime. In early February 2010 she was transferred to HMP East Sutton Park and assigned the inmate identity number A2760AG. HMP East Sutton Park is an "open prison" i.e. has the lowest possible security rating in the British penal system. There are no security fences surrounding the prison and, subject to conditions, inmates are able to leave the grounds for home visits. McCorkle remained at HMP East Sutton Park until her release from prison on 25 June 2010.
On 30 October 2008, McCorkle received a letter from the United States Office of the Pardon Attorney rejecting her request for commutation of her sentence.
She and her husband, both represented by F. Lee Bailey, were each originally sentenced to over 24 years in federal prison, under mandatory sentencing laws. After two appeals, the McCorkles' sentences were reduced, in 2006, to 18 years.
After several years of legal appeals against her sentence, McCorkle applied to transfer to a British prison to serve the remainder of her sentence, under the terms of a reciprocal treaty with the USA. However, her application was rejected in July 2006. McCorkle reapplied for a treaty transfer in 2008 but her application was once again rejected in October of that year.
The severity of McCorkle's sentence drew notice in the United Kingdom, both in national media such as the BBC and amongst British politicians. On 22 February 2005, Early Day Motion number 733 in the British Houses of Parliament debated the following topic:-
That this House notes that Chantal McCorkle, a British citizen, was sentenced to 24 years and four months imprisonment in the United States for offences which might carry only a suspended sentence in the UK; further notes that the judge who sentenced her in 1999 expressed disquiet at the sentence that she felt obliged to give; further notes that recent cases of Blakely and Booker in the United States Supreme Court cast doubt on the sentencing guidelines then used and give grounds for an appeal; and urges the Government to support Chantal's lawyers and press the United States legal system to hear Chantal's appeal against sentence as expeditiously as possible and to ensure that no barriers are placed to Chantal's transfer to the UK to serve whatever remaining sentence she has after her appeal.
McCorkle's incarceration in the US Federal Prison system began on 5 November 1998. She was assigned the following inmate identification number: 23033-018.
Chantal Watts McCorkle (born 1968, in Slough, England) is a British citizen. Along with her American husband, William J. McCorkle (formerly Gonzalez), she was tried and convicted, in 1998, in Florida, for her part in a financial fraud. The McCorkles sold kits purporting to show buyers how to get rich by buying property in foreclosures and government auctions. They advertised on infomercials; among the grounds for their conviction was their representation in the infomercials that they owned luxury automobiles and aeroplanes which had been rented for the commercials, and their use of purported testimonials from satisfied customers, who were paid actors.